![]() ![]() (6) On June 16, 2005, O'Brien and a number of accomplices waited in a minivan for the arrival of an armored car making a scheduled cash delivery to a bank in Boston's North End. Martin O'Brien's career as a criminal ended with a number of bangs, and perhaps a whimper as well, when he received his 102-month sentence from Judge Mark Wolf of the District of Massachusetts. Furthermore, the Court's decision in O'Brien may signal a growing acceptance by the Court of the seeming incongruity of the differential constitutional treatment of maximum sentences and mandatory minimum sentences, an issue that was highly controversial less than a decade ago. United States (5) that should never have been promulgated in the first instance, thereby building law upon bad law. In reaching this conclusion, the Court relied heavily on a test from Castillo v. (4) In O'Brien, the Court found that the statutory provision at issue defined a criminal element and not a sentencing factor, but upheld the notion that an increase in a defendant's mandatory minimum sentence could be ordered on the basis of sentencing factors found by a judge by evidentiary preponderance, and did not necessarily require proof to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. (3) For more than a decade, the Court has made clear that the requisite standard for increases in the maximum available sentence in a given case is proof to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. ![]() At the heart of the issue in O'Brien was the mandatory minimum sentence, a statutory instrument favored by Congress since the mid-1980s that sets a floor under, rather than a specific value for or a ceiling on, the sentence a judge can impose on a convicted defendant. ![]() O'Brien (2) shows that the question of where the role of the judge ends and that of the jury begins remains controversial. Although the competition between the institutions of the judge and jury for power within the legal system is hardly new, extending back well into the hazy mist of our legal system's common law origins, (1) the Supreme Court's decision last Term in United States v. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |